Choosing the Right NDT Method

Non-destructive testing covers a wide range of techniques — VT, UT, PAUT, MT, PT, RT, ET — and picking the wrong one for the job wastes time, misses defects, or produces results that won't stand up to scrutiny. Here is a practical guide to which method suits which application, and when phased array adds value over conventional approaches.

Visual Testing (VT)
VT is the starting point for almost every inspection. A qualified inspector examines the surface directly — with the naked eye, a mirror, or a borescope where access is limited. It finds surface-breaking defects: cracks, corrosion, weld profile issues, misalignment, and mechanical damage. It is fast and inexpensive, and for many routine inspections it is sufficient. The limitation is obvious — it cannot detect subsurface defects.

Magnetic Particle Testing (MT)
MT is used on ferromagnetic materials (steel, cast iron) to detect surface and near-surface defects. The component is magnetised and iron particles are applied — defects cause the magnetic field to leak, pulling the particles into a visible indication. MT is excellent for weld toe cracks, fatigue cracks, and corrosion pitting that is just below the surface. It does not work on non-ferrous materials, and it requires the surface to be reasonably clean and accessible.

Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT)
PT works on any non-porous material — steel, stainless, aluminium, plastics — and detects surface-breaking defects by drawing a penetrant fluid into discontinuities and then pulling it back out with a developer. It is straightforward to apply, portable, and effective on complex geometries. The limitation is the same as MT: subsurface defects are invisible.

Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
UT sends high-frequency sound waves into a component and measures the echo returned by defects or the back wall. It detects volumetric defects — porosity, inclusions, lack of fusion, laminations — and can measure wall thickness without access to both sides. Conventional UT is a single-beam technique: the inspector moves the probe manually, building a picture from multiple readings. It is reliable in experienced hands and well understood by regulators and insurers.

Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT)
PAUT uses an array of ultrasonic elements that can be electronically steered and focused to produce a cross-sectional image of the component in real time. Compared to conventional UT, it covers more volume per scan, produces a visual record of the inspection, and can characterise defects more accurately — particularly in welds and complex geometries. Where conventional UT gives you a single A-scan reading, PAUT gives you a sectorial or linear scan image that is easier to interpret, archive, and defend.

When to use PAUT over conventional UT:
- Thick-section welds where coverage and characterisation matter
- Nozzle and pipe-to-pipe welds with limited access
- Corrosion mapping where wall loss is progressive and documented trending is required
- Any inspection where the client, insurer, or regulator expects a visual record of findings

Radiographic Testing (RT)
RT uses X-ray or gamma radiation to produce an image of the internal structure of a component on film or a digital detector. It is the most direct method for detecting volumetric defects and is widely specified for pressure vessel and piping welds. The limitations are the radiation safety requirements — exclusion zones, permits, and trained personnel — and the time required to set up and process film.

Eddy Current Testing (ET)
ET is used primarily on non-ferrous materials and for surface or near-surface defect detection in conductors. It is fast for scanning large areas and does not require direct contact with the surface. Common applications include heat exchanger tube inspection and aircraft component testing.

Choosing the Right Method
Most inspections require more than one technique. A weld inspection programme on a pressure vessel, for example, might use VT for surface condition, PAUT for volumetric weld quality, and MT for weld toe cracks. The method should match the defect type you are looking for, the material, the access available, and the standard you are working to.

DEG Survey & Inspection holds IANZ accreditation for VT, UT, PAUT, MT, and PT, with Level 3 certified personnel across all major disciplines. If you are unsure which method is right for your application, talk to us before you write the ITP.

Get in touch: admin@deg.nz